<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Now what?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unlikelymissionary.com/2006/11/05/now-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unlikelymissionary.com/2006/11/05/now-what/</link>
	<description>The book, the blog, the author, the conversation.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://unlikelymissionary.com/2006/11/05/now-what/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unlikelymissionary.com/?p=11#comment-4</guid>
		<description>You said, "Do I have to make a decision?" It seems to me one only MUST make a decision if one is in a situation to affect change or maintain the status quo. In other words, unless one is a delegate and asked to vote on the issue then ambivalence is acceptable. My biggest frustration is with those who believe ambivalence is a virtue. It should not be considered a virtue, but rather an occasional necessity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said, &#8220;Do I have to make a decision?&#8221; It seems to me one only MUST make a decision if one is in a situation to affect change or maintain the status quo. In other words, unless one is a delegate and asked to vote on the issue then ambivalence is acceptable. My biggest frustration is with those who believe ambivalence is a virtue. It should not be considered a virtue, but rather an occasional necessity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
